London, December 09, 2025
Environmental activist Tzeporah Berman sharply criticised Canada’s approach to climate policy as the government moves forward with approving a new oil pipeline, contrasting it with the United Kingdom’s recent decisive measures to phase out fossil fuels and reduce emissions. Berman’s remarks highlight a perceived failure by Canada to align with global climate imperatives and indigenous concerns.
Critique of Canada’s Environmental Stance
Berman labelled Canada’s environmental “realism” as essentially conceding to the oil industry rather than responding pragmatically to climate science. While Canada prepares to approve a controversial pipeline project, she argues this move contradicts necessary climate commitments and undermines efforts to decarbonize the economy. Berman paints this stance not as realistic pragmatism but as a political surrender in the face of fossil fuel pressures.
International Contrast: The UK’s Bold Climate Actions
In stark contrast, the UK has recently announced a ban on new oil and gas licenses in the North Sea, implemented a windfall tax on fossil fuel profits, and accelerated plans to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. These policies reflect a strategy grounded firmly in scientific urgency and the public interest, positioning the UK as advancing global climate leadership.
Impact on Indigenous Communities and Environmental Risks
First Nations tribes in Canada have voiced serious concerns regarding the pipeline, citing environmental threats and fears of “worst-case scenarios.” These voices underscore the social and ecological ramifications of Canada’s current trajectory, raising profound questions about the rights and safety of Indigenous peoples amid national energy decisions.
Regulatory Rollbacks and Emission Challenges
Compounding these concerns, Canada has experienced delays and reversals in methane emission regulations. The cancellation of emissions caps on oil and gas sectors and exemptions from clean electricity standards in certain provinces further weaken the country’s climate progress. These regulatory setbacks contrast with international efforts that increasingly prioritize methane control and emission reductions.
Global Context and Canada’s Role in Climate Leadership
Berman’s critique underscores a critical junction where global leaders are embracing bold climate policies, yet Canada’s current trajectory signals a retreat from environmental responsibility. This approach risks not only the country’s climate targets but also broader environmental sustainability and the well-being of Indigenous populations.
Amid escalating global climate urgency, Canada’s decisions will have significant repercussions, influencing its standing on international climate action and casting a long shadow over domestic environmental and social policies.