Cancer-Causing Donor Fathers 200+ Children: Health Crisis Unveiled

Sperm from donor with cancer-causing gene was used to conceive almost 200 children

London, December 10, 2025

A sperm donor carrying a previously unknown cancer-causing mutation in the TP53 gene has fathered nearly 200 children across Europe over 17 years, raising critical health concerns as several donor-conceived children suffer from cancers, with some dying young. The donations began in 2005 through the European Sperm Bank and involved multiple countries, highlighting systemic regulatory gaps.

Genetic Mutation and Health Risks

The donor’s mutation affects the TP53 gene, a crucial tumor suppressor responsible for preventing cancer development. This particular mutation was previously unknown and undetectable by standard genetic screening at the time of donation. Although only about 20% of the donor’s sperm carried the mutation, each child conceived from those sperm inherits the mutation in every cell, significantly increasing their lifetime risk of developing cancer.

Multiple children have already been diagnosed with cancers, some with two distinct types, and a small number have died prematurely due to these diseases. This alarming situation has brought the mutation’s impact from a genetic anomaly to a pressing public health crisis among families and medical authorities.

Scope and Distribution of Donations

The donor began sperm donation in 2005 through the European Sperm Bank based in Denmark. The donated sperm was supplied to fertility clinics in several European countries, with Belgium alone reporting at least 53 children conceived from this donor’s sperm. In total, nearly 200 children have been identified across Europe as offspring of this donor.

The widespread distribution across borders was facilitated by the sperm bank’s international reach and the practice of fertility tourism, where patients travel to other countries for assisted reproduction services, sometimes circumventing national regulations and donor limits.

Regulatory Shortcomings and Fertility Tourism

This case exposes significant weaknesses in the regulatory frameworks governing sperm donation in Europe. There is no unified European regulation or agreed limits on the number of children a single donor can father. Consequently, this donor’s number of offspring far exceeds limits imposed by some countries, including Belgium and Spain.

Fertility tourism exacerbated the issue, with patients seeking treatment across borders and clinics inadequately reporting donor use numbers. This lack of comprehensive oversight allowed the donor’s sperm to be widely circulated beyond national controls, raising ethical and safety concerns for donor-conceived families.

Investigations and Calls for Reform

Authorities and medical experts have launched investigations into the fertility clinics involved and the European Sperm Bank’s screening and distribution practices. This scandal has triggered urgent calls for enhanced regulation, improved tracking of donor contributions, and mandatory genetic screening protocols to prevent the distribution of defective genetic material.

Experts emphasize the need for coordinated European policies addressing donor limits, genetic testing standards, transparency, and cross-border patient management to safeguard the health and rights of children conceived through sperm donation.

Context and Significance

The TP53 gene plays a vital role in suppressing tumor formation by enabling DNA repair and triggering cell death if damage is irreparable. Mutations in this gene are strongly associated with various cancers. The unique factor in this case is the mutation’s novelty and undetectability during the donor’s active period, when screening technology and genetic knowledge were limited.

This incident underscores the critical importance of rigorous genetic screening and continuous updating of donor health assessments as genetic science advances. It also highlights systemic vulnerabilities in fertility services across Europe that demand immediate attention from policymakers, medical professionals, and regulatory bodies.

The unfolding developments in this case represent a cautionary tale with profound implications for assisted reproduction and genetic safety, as affected families and authorities seek accountability and reforms to prevent similar tragedies.