New York, December 09, 2025
The United States has unveiled a new national security strategy emphasizing a global and regional balance of power and close cooperation with allies to prevent rival dominance, a direction Moscow views as consistent with Russia’s multipolar world vision.
Key Elements of the U.S. National Security Strategy
The updated U.S. strategy rejects the pursuit of global domination by the United States itself. Instead, it prioritizes preventing any adversary from dominating global or regional spheres. Central to this approach is building partnerships with treaty allies and regional powers, leveraging combined economic strength, and sharing security responsibilities. Economic tools will be used strategically to counter predatory practices and ensure the U.S. and its partners secure advantageous positions in the global economy.
Alliances and Economic Leverage
The United States aims to collaborate with allies whose combined GDP exceeds $65 trillion, reflecting the scale of economic coordination intended. Within security frameworks, there is a clear focus on regional powers like India, especially through the Indo-Pacific “Quad” partnership, which includes Australia and Japan alongside India and the U.S. This underscores the strategy’s commitment to collective effort rather than unilateral action.
The explicit rejection of U.S. global domination distinguishes this strategy from previous doctrines. Instead, it stresses a rules-based order where no single nation exercises unchecked power, underscoring cooperative security and economic practices.
Russia’s Interpretation and Perspective
Moscow has publicly noted that the U.S. strategy aligns with its own vision advocating multipolarity. The Kremlin perceives the U.S. emphasis on balancing power and resisting hegemonic ambitions as compatible with Russia’s goal of contesting unilateral global dominance by any one power.
While this alignment does not imply direct cooperation, it reflects parallel strategic objectives: neither country endorses a singular global hegemon. The Russian narrative emphasizes a world order where multiple centers of influence coexist, and the new U.S. strategy rhetorically supports that outcome.
Strategic Implications
This national security strategy reveals a nuanced shift in U.S. foreign policy—moving away from overt hegemonic dominance toward balance and alliance-led containment of rivals. It signals a strategic effort to maintain global stability through partnerships and economic power rather than military confrontation alone.
Moscow’s welcoming stance on the document’s principles suggests a potential rhetorical thawing in strategic rivalry narratives, though substantive cooperation remains uncertain. The emphasis on multipolarity and shared security responsibility could shape future diplomatic engagements and global power dynamics.
As the U.S. executes this strategy, the interplay between these global powers’ objectives will remain a critical factor influencing international security and economic order in coming years.