New York, November 28, 2025
WNBA players have publicly rejected the league’s latest collective bargaining agreement (CBA) proposal, calling it a “slap in the face” as negotiations continue in New York through late November 2025, stressing unresolved issues around revenue sharing, salary growth, and benefits.
Players’ Rejection of the Latest Proposal
WNBA players have described the league’s newest CBA offer as inadequate, citing a failure to meet core demands. Despite increases that could allow maximum earnings of over $1.1 million when combining base salary and revenue sharing, players argue the guaranteed base “supermax” salary remains too low. Many see the proposal as failing to provide a sustainable economic framework that fairly reflects the league’s business growth, labeling the offer as a dismissal of their key priorities.
Core Concerns: Revenue Sharing, Salary Structure, and Benefits
A primary player grievance is the revenue-sharing mechanism, which has yet to be triggered under the current CBA and remains insufficiently addressed in the new proposal. The union demands a revenue-sharing system more directly linked to league profitability. Additionally, the proposed salary cap growth of a fixed 3% annually is viewed as too modest to support realistic salary increases, restricting the players’ earning potential. Base salaries remain notably low, with supermax salaries only in the six-figure range, contrasting with players’ hopes for a more substantial raise from 2025 minimums around $66,000. Other unresolved priorities include formalizing charter travel benefits, roster expansions, and a softer cap structure.
Negotiation Status and Potential Labor Dispute Risks
Negotiations were initially set to conclude by October 31 but were extended 30 days to November 30, 2025. Both parties retain the right to opt out with 48 hours’ notice. While tension escalates, no strike or lockout has been called, and any work stoppage would require a formal vote. The looming deadline has amplified pressure for a timely agreement to avoid disruptions ahead of the upcoming season.
Divergent Views Amid Ongoing Talks
League officials maintain public confidence in the negotiation process; Minnesota Lynx coach Cheryl Reeve characterized progress as “normal” in late November. However, the player union remains firm that the current proposal does not meet critical demands or advance labor relations meaningfully. This divergence reflects the broader complexity within ongoing talks as both sides seek a resolution that balances league growth with player compensation and benefits.
The WNBA and its players now face intensified scrutiny to conclude negotiations swiftly, with the economic structure of the league and players’ livelihoods hanging in the balance. The outcome will have significant implications for labor relations and the professional future of the women’s basketball league.